Archive for the ‘Existence’ Category

Social responsibility has nothing to do with it.  It’s about making money, as it should be. Michael Hirsch for Newsweek casts Lloyd Blankfein in the role of contemporary successor to J. P. Morgan and bemoans the general loss of conscience in finance. Banking and trading have always been about making money.  Social responsibility is a corollary that doesn’t reflect the reality of today’s hyper-efficient and hyper-connected markets. Finance at the highest levels today is in a place where morals and business simply cannot coexist.

I agree with Blankfein’s assessment.  Can regulation change this crisis in the culture of finance, a culture that clearly thrives on asymmetric information and the ironic poetry of selling someone a bad deal?

There is only one kind of regulation that could begin to modulate this behavior in America.  It would be a broad-based consumption tax that extends to online commerce of all kinds.  The greed of global finance reflects in concentrated form the obsessive consumption of the contemporary developed world.  The world economy is not driven by firms like Goldman; it is driven by the hard work and hard spending of people in the developed world.  As long as there is stiff competition for the output and consumption of these people, firms will do all they can to court them by working towards access to capital that only firms like Goldman can deliver in sufficient quantities.

People want and expect more, and the current system is the best yet devised for achieving that goal for the fortunate few—who already have significant earning power. But are people really getting their money’s worth?

As long as the calculus in the minds of the movers of the economy (remember, it’s the people) is that more consumption equals greater happiness, the path followed by international captains of finance will not waver.  More consumption has been proven not to increase happiness, but it is difficult to “settle” for less after having had more, even if one is happier with less.

Social responsibility begins on Main Street.  Maybe it should be called trickle-up economics.


Read Full Post »

Stephen Hawking recently stated the opinion that Earth should not attract the attention of likely extra-terrestrial life through intiatives such as active SETI.  While the possibilities he describes are frightening, is Earth a plausible target for space marauders?

I don’t believe it is.  Earth has little to offer to life that may possess the capability of intergalactic travel.  The advanced technology needed for this kind of travel would require the capability to harness huge quantities of energy that probably surpass what is delivered by the Sun we orbit.  It frankly wouldn’t be worth the trouble to life that can make it here.

In spite of disagreeing with the conclusions that follow from his disavowal of the search for intelligent extra-terrestrial life, I agree that active SETI is a foolish enterprise and that Earth needs a more tightly-regulated global outlook on this kind of intentional transmission into space.  Earth is a planet but also a space capsule for all of life as we know it, and we must take better care of it from within and from without.  It often takes the mind of a genius to help us recognize this.  In Hawking’s case, it’s the galactic perspective.

Read Full Post »